Scenario Planning
Strategic Planinng
Change Management
ERP
Balanced Scorecard
Systems integration
Organizational culture
Organizational structure
Employee surveys
360 Feedback
Group dynamics
Management training
Executive coaching
Six Sigma
Total Quality Management
Project Management
ISO 9000
Organized Change was instrumental in helping Wavecom (a French-based telecommunications company) identify and solve internal tensions hindering organizational growth. In a few weeks Organized Change brought solutions to bring clarity
David Chaudron, PhD
It boils down to four things: identity, interdependence, relationships, and task accomplishment. If a collection of people don't identify themselves as a unit and others don't as well, they don't depend on each other, there is a minimal relationship and they don't have a common task to accomplish, they're just a bunch. One example of a bunch might be a collection of strangers waiting for a bus. On the other end of the spectrum, teams have all these aspects. Groups have some of these characteristics (relationships, for example), but don't necessary band together to accomplish a task.
Teams can differ in several ways: their duration, the degree of structure/self organization, and their relationship to the organization and other teams. Teams that are organized for a short-term purpose, have a designated leader-manager, and have a “tight” connection with the organization will work very differently than teams that have long-term goals, choose their own leader, and have little connection with the organization.
Some symptoms of poor teamwork include: poor performance; groupthink, where group members avoid confrontation and discourage dissension to give the appearance of harmony; “drops and plops”, big differences between what members think should happen and what actually happens; assignments aren't executed, especially because someone thought someone else was doing the task; few people perform beyond expectations; personal attacks and sabotage; an increase in absenteeism and turnover.
There are lots of these, and the most common causes of poor teamwork: senior management not encouraging it ; measurement, performance and pay systems discouraging teamwork; a combination of functional organizational structure and work flows that are “silo” based; and a poorly defined or executed strategic plan.
These include an imbalance between the structure or fluidity required to perform the task, and the resources, constraints and abilities of team members; insufficient clarity as to who does what; insufficient and unclear communications between team members; and a disconnect between what is expected of the team and what the team wants to/can accomplish.
These include ignorance of conflict resolution skills; unwillingness to speak up when things are going wrong; a poor mix of team members that result in insufficient skills, conflicting priorities and personalities.
That depends on how widespread the problem is, and how much influence you have. And whatever you do, make sure to conduct a thorough assessment of teamwork issues before acting.
On one hand, if teamwork problems are across the organization, organization-wide solutions have to be put in place. Changes in organizational structure, pay systems, criteria for promotion and management, and changing workflow come to mind.On the other hand, If the problems are isolated just a group or two, you can do other things: Select a new supervisor who is trained in making teams work; removing or adding group members; defining goals, relationships and methods of getting there; providing measurements and incentives meeting goals;task-focused teambuilding to deal with issues and concerns; and training in group dynamics and problem solving.